Some links with information about creating a Google Sitemap either directly in XML or via some .NET code.
http://gerardmcgarry.com/blog/creating-a-google-sitemap-aspnet-website
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/GoogleSiteMapProvider.aspx
Some links with information about creating a Google Sitemap either directly in XML or via some .NET code.
http://gerardmcgarry.com/blog/creating-a-google-sitemap-aspnet-website
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/GoogleSiteMapProvider.aspx
ResourceBlender is open source and works for .NET:
Usually when I need to test a HTML design, I use Spoon browsers… but I saw this IE Tester 0.4.2 tool.
This is just to remind me, don’t install, it made the JavaScript of Gmail and other sites fail.
So, stick to Spoon, don’t use IETester 0.4.2.
My development tools are currently Visual Studio 2008, Resharper 4.5, Gallio and Testdriven.NET. But for as long as I have used these tools, my Visual Studio debugger has only worked partly.
When I inserted some breakpoints in my code, the first one was almost all the time hit. However, when I tried to step through the code, it worked fine for a bout 3-6 steps. But then Visual Studio debugger decided that was enough, and just completed the code.
The good thing was, it forced me to write many unit test cases, but sometimes I really think it is nice to visually see the state of your objects, in the code.
I have spoken to colleagues, and tested with different combinations of Gallio, Testdriven.NET and Re-sharper enabled, as I thought they cased the problem. But the debugger just kept bugging me. I had actually given up finding a solution to this problem, thinking that Visual Studio 2010 would fix it.
So finally, in a complete other context, I stumbled upon this page:
http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/KB957912
And thought…. that title sounds interesting… I quickly moved to the KB article, and started to read. I thought, that sounds exactly as my problem.
With nothing to loose I installed the update, and started to test the debugger… until now it seems to work
- please note, I do not use the debugger that often as I write very reliable code
– Updated on the 2. January 2010
I have been using NHibernate for some time now, and I am very satisfied with the functionality it provides. However, I do really not like “magic strings” as these makes the code resistent to refactoring.
NHibernate makes use of “magic strings” when doing a query using HQL or the Criteria API. I tend to use the Criteria API as this, opposed to HQL, limits the logic encompassed in “magic strings”.
As I mostly use the Criteria API, I thought, why not do something about it
So I did. Very quickly a Fluent Criteria interface was implemented. Here is how it is used:
var email = "email@email.com";
var customerType = CustomerType.Default;
var result = nhSession.Criteria<Customer>()
.Add.Equals(x => x.Email, email)
.Add.Equals(x => x.Type, customerType)
.Order.Desc(x => x.Created)
.NHCriteria
.SetMaxResults(1)
.UniqueResult<Customer>();
In this line we call the extension method Criteria with Customer as a generic argument:
var result = nhSession.Criteria<Customer>()
By doing so we of the alternate Fluent Criteria API I have implemented. Currently it is only some of the Restrictions and Order classes that have been implemented, but you are free to use these classes and extend them as you wish.
By calling the NHCriteria property, you get the normal NHibernate criteria API, so here you can set the cache options, max results, etc.
Download the source code here http://ovesen.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=NHibernateFluentCriteria&referringTitle=Home
Happy New Year btw
I have experienced the first major project with a memory leak problem… and how do one get started with Memory leak finding.
It is a tough task and the learning curve is quite steep.
You have to get to know the WinDbg. You can start here: http://blogs.msdn.com/tess/pages/net-debugging-demos-information-and-setup-instructions.aspx
Tess Ferrandez has some very nice “Debugging labs”, well take a look at: http://blogs.msdn.com/tess/
If you have a problem with a memory leak, take a look at his one:
I have been using Castle Windsor and NHibernate for some months now, so I am a bit new and still learning. But then again, it is learning developers like me, that asks all the questions.
This post is also written because of a simple question: Does the HybridSessionBuilder support multiple configurations?
Why this question? Well, I have a project where some repositories uses one database and some other uses another database.
My little journey started out with my looking original implementation of the HybridSessionBuilder (HSB). You can read about the original implementation here:
http://jeffreypalermo.com/blog/use-this-nhibernate-wrapper-to-keep-your-repository-classes-simple/
The original implementation used a static session factory and session, so this is does not support multiple configurations.
I then found out that the CodeCampServer also was using the HSB. Hoping to find an implementation that supported my request, I then started to read the source code.
But by viewing the source code for CodeCampServer I soon found out that the code, for the HSB, had been updated to support multiple factories and sessions. Yeeeaaaaa
Furthermore I found out that the HSB now is a part of a collection of libraries called Tarantino.
I was happy, the HybridSessionBuilder now supported my requests, and it was ready to be used in my projects. I thought.
Then I build a small test web application project. It used Castle Windsor (for dependency injection) and NHibernate. I quickly configured Castle Windsor and made two NHibernate configuration files.
nhibernate.cfg.xml used this connection string:
Data Source=localhost\sqlexpress;Initial Catalog=DB1;Integrated Security=true
nhibernate2.cfg.xml used this connection string:
Data Source=localhost\sqlexpress;Initial Catalog=DB2;Integrated Security=true
My windsor.config.xml looks like this:
<component id="firstRepository" type="HybridSessionBuilderTest.FirstRepository, HybridSessionBuilderTest">
<parameters>
<ConfigurationFile>hibernate.cfg.xml</ConfigurationFile>
</parameters>
</component>
<component id="secondRepository" type="HybridSessionBuilderTest.SecondRepository, HybridSessionBuilderTest">
<parameters>
<ConfigurationFile>hibernate2.cfg.xml</ConfigurationFile>
</parameters>
</component>
It basically just configures the two repositories with each own configuration.
But to my surprise, it did not work. I made a small page that prints the connection string of each of the repositories:
Only the default NHibernate configuration file was used.
That was not the output I was looking for, so to find the problem, I did some more test and dug into the code.
I was expecting an object structure like this:
But I got something like this:
I identified the following method to be the central, when the session was instantiated:
1: private ISession getExistingOrNewSession(ISessionFactory factory, string configurationFile)
2: {
3: if (HttpContext.Current != null)
4: {
5: var session = GetExistingWebSession();
6:
7: if (session == null || !session.IsOpen)
8: {
9: session = openSessionAndAddToContext(factory, configurationFile);
10: }
11:
12: return session;
13: }
14:
15: var currentSession = _currentSessions.ContainsKey(configurationFile)
16: ? _currentSessions[configurationFile]
17: : null;
18: if (currentSession == null || !currentSession.IsOpen)
19: {
20: _currentSessions[configurationFile] = OpenSession(factory);
21: }
22:
23: return _currentSessions[configurationFile];
24: }
The problem I identified is line #5. It returns the existing session based on the default configuration, no matter what you specify in the configurationFile parameter.
I changed it to:
1: var session = GetExistingWebSession(configurationFile);
And tadaaa:
The second repository now uses the second configuration file
You might ask, why I spend time writing a blog post describing this little change to the HybridSessionBuilder.
First of all, having a HSB that can use multiple configurations is rather important to me and the projects I am working on.
Second of all, as NHibernate and Castle Windsor is still a bit new to me, one of the best ways to learn its capabilities and how to use it, is to dig in deep. And that is exactly what I have done.
And BTW – I have not just learned about HSB, but also CodeCampServer, Tarantino, S#arp and how it handles multiple configurations, and how it all works together.
Please note. Before my change is used, you need to also update the NHibernateSessionModule. It does currently not dispose all the sessions that are opened.
I have been using Castle Windsor and NHibernate for some months now, so I am a bit new and still learning. But then again, it is learning developers like me, that asks all the questions.
This post is also written because of a simple question: Does the HybridSessionBuilder support multiple configurations?
Why this question? Well, I have a project where some repositories uses one database and some other uses another database.
My little journey started out with my looking original implementation of the HybridSessionBuilder (HSB). You can read about the original implementation here:
http://jeffreypalermo.com/blog/use-this-nhibernate-wrapper-to-keep-your-repository-classes-simple/
The original implementation used a static session factory and session, so this is does not support multiple configurations.
I then found out that the CodeCampServer also was using the HSB. Hoping to find an implementation that supported my request, I then started to read the source code.
But by viewing the source code for CodeCampServer I soon found out that the code, for the HSB, had been updated to support multiple factories and sessions. Yeeeaaaaa
Furthermore I found out that the HSB now is a part of a collection of libraries called Tarantino.
I was happy, the HybridSessionBuilder now supported my requests, and it was ready to be used in my projects. I thought.
Then I build a small test web application project. It used Castle Windsor (for dependency injection) and NHibernate. I quickly configured Castle Windsor and made two NHibernate configuration files.
nhibernate.cfg.xml used this connection string:
Data Source=localhost\sqlexpress;Initial Catalog=DB1;Integrated Security=true
nhibernate2.cfg.xml used this connection string:
Data Source=localhost\sqlexpress;Initial Catalog=DB2;Integrated Security=true
My windsor.config.xml looks like this:
<component id="firstRepository" type="HybridSessionBuilderTest.FirstRepository, HybridSessionBuilderTest">
<parameters>
<ConfigurationFile>hibernate.cfg.xml</ConfigurationFile>
</parameters>
</component>
<component id="secondRepository" type="HybridSessionBuilderTest.SecondRepository, HybridSessionBuilderTest">
<parameters>
<ConfigurationFile>hibernate2.cfg.xml</ConfigurationFile>
</parameters>
</component>
It basically just configures the two repositories with each own configuration.
But to my surprise, it did not work. I made a small page that prints the connection string of each of the repositories:
Only the default NHibernate configuration file was used.
That was not the output I was looking for, so to find the problem, I did some more test and dug into the code.
I was expecting an object structure like this:
But I got something like this:
I identified the following method to be the central, when the session was instantiated:
1: private ISession getExistingOrNewSession(ISessionFactory factory, string configurationFile)
2: {
3: if (HttpContext.Current != null)
4: {
5: var session = GetExistingWebSession();
6:
7: if (session == null || !session.IsOpen)
8: {
9: session = openSessionAndAddToContext(factory, configurationFile);
10: }
11:
12: return session;
13: }
14:
15: var currentSession = _currentSessions.ContainsKey(configurationFile)
16: ? _currentSessions[configurationFile]
17: : null;
18: if (currentSession == null || !currentSession.IsOpen)
19: {
20: _currentSessions[configurationFile] = OpenSession(factory);
21: }
22:
23: return _currentSessions[configurationFile];
24: }
The problem I identified is line #5. It returns the existing session based on the default configuration, no matter what you specify in the configurationFile parameter.
I changed it to:
1: var session = GetExistingWebSession(configurationFile);
And tadaaa:
The second repository now uses the second configuration file
You might ask, why I spend time writing a blog post describing this little change to the HybridSessionBuilder.
First of all, having a HSB that can use multiple configurations is rather important to me and the projects I am working on.
Second of all, as NHibernate and Castle Windsor is still a bit new to me, one of the best ways to learn its capabilities and how to use it, is to dig in deep. And that is exactly what I have done.
And BTW – I have not just learned about HSB, but also CodeCampServer, Tarantino, S#arp and how it handles multiple configurations, and how it all works together.
I have been using Castle Windsor and NHibernate for some months now, so I am a bit new and still learning. But then again, it is learning developers like me, that asks all the questions.
This post is also written because of a simple question: Does the HybridSessionBuilder support multiple configurations?
Why this question? Well, I have a project where some repositories uses one database and some other uses another database.
My little journey started out with my looking original implementation of the HybridSessionBuilder (HSB). You can read about the original implementation here:
http://jeffreypalermo.com/blog/use-this-nhibernate-wrapper-to-keep-your-repository-classes-simple/
The original implementation used a static session factory and session, so this is does not support multiple configurations.
I then found out that the CodeCampServer also was using the HSB. Hoping to find an implementation that supported my request, I then started to read the source code.
But by viewing the source code for CodeCampServer I soon found out that the code, for the HSB, had been updated to support multiple factories and sessions. Yeeeaaaaa
Furthermore I found out that the HSB now is a part of a collection of libraries called Tarantino.
I was happy, the HybridSessionBuilder now supported my requests, and it was ready to be used in my projects. I thought.
Then I build a small test web application project. It used Castle Windsor (for dependency injection) and NHibernate. I quickly configured Castle Windsor and made two NHibernate configuration files.
nhibernate.cfg.xml used this connection string:
Data Source=localhost\sqlexpress;Initial Catalog=DB1;Integrated Security=true
nhibernate2.cfg.xml used this connection string:
Data Source=localhost\sqlexpress;Initial Catalog=DB2;Integrated Security=true
My windsor.config.xml looks like this:
<component id="firstRepository" type="HybridSessionBuilderTest.FirstRepository, HybridSessionBuilderTest">
<parameters>
<ConfigurationFile>hibernate.cfg.xml</ConfigurationFile>
</parameters>
</component>
<component id="secondRepository" type="HybridSessionBuilderTest.SecondRepository, HybridSessionBuilderTest">
<parameters>
<ConfigurationFile>hibernate2.cfg.xml</ConfigurationFile>
</parameters>
</component>
It basically just configures the two repositories with each own configuration.
But to my surprise, it did not work. I made a small page that prints the connection string of each of the repositories:
Only the default NHibernate configuration file was used.
That was not the output I was looking for, so to find the problem, I did some more test and dug into the code.
I was expecting an object structure like this:
But I got something like this:
I identified the following method to be the central, when the session was instantiated:
1: private ISession getExistingOrNewSession(ISessionFactory factory, string configurationFile)
2: {
3: if (HttpContext.Current != null)
4: {
5: var session = GetExistingWebSession();
6:
7: if (session == null || !session.IsOpen)
8: {
9: session = openSessionAndAddToContext(factory, configurationFile);
10: }
11:
12: return session;
13: }
14:
15: var currentSession = _currentSessions.ContainsKey(configurationFile)
16: ? _currentSessions[configurationFile]
17: : null;
18: if (currentSession == null || !currentSession.IsOpen)
19: {
20: _currentSessions[configurationFile] = OpenSession(factory);
21: }
22:
23: return _currentSessions[configurationFile];
24: }
The problem I identified is line #5. It returns the existing session based on the default configuration, no matter what you specify in the configurationFile parameter.
I changed it to:
1: var session = GetExistingWebSession(configurationFile);
And tadaaa:
The second repository now uses the second configuration file
You might ask, why I spend time writing a blog post describing this little change to the HybridSessionBuilder.
First of all, having a HSB that can use multiple configurations is rather important to me and the projects I am working on.
Second of all, as NHibernate and Castle Windsor is still a bit new to me, one of the best ways to learn its capabilities and how to use it, is to dig in deep. And that is exactly what I have done.
And BTW – I have not just learned about HSB, but also CodeCampServer, Tarantino, S#arp and how it handles multiple configurations, and how it all works together.
MSBuild is soooo nice when it comes to automating compilation, testing, deployment or some other tedious task.
Until now, I believed that publishing a website application was a manual task, performed from Visual Studio.
But it is actually possible to perform publishing from the command line. Take a look at this Build.xml file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<Project xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003" ToolsVersion="3.5">
<PropertyGroup>
<OutputFolder>$(MSBuildProjectDirectory)\..\Published\</OutputFolder>
<LibDir>..\Lib\</LibDir>
</PropertyGroup>
<Import Project="$(MSBuildBinPath)\Microsoft.CSharp.targets" />
<Import Project="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v9.0\WebApplications\Microsoft.WebApplication.targets" />
<Import Project="$(LibDir)\msbuild\MSBuild.Community.Tasks.Targets"/>
<Target Name="Publish">
<RemoveDir Directories="$(OutputFolder)"
ContinueOnError="true" />
<MSBuild Projects="..\Core\bmv3.org.oxweb.csproj"
Targets="ResolveReferences; _CopyWebApplication"
Properties="WebProjectOutputDir=$(OutputFolder); OutDir=$(WebProjectOutputDir)\" />
</Target>
</Project>
If you want to read more about using MSBuild, then take a look at this tutorial:
http://codingcockerel.co.uk/2008/04/15/automating-the-build-with-msbuild/
Are you interested in reading more about the publishing using MSBuild, then read here:
http://codingcockerel.co.uk/2008/05/18/how-to-publish-a-web-site-with-msbuild/
http://blog.m.jedynak.pl/2008/03/publishing-web-application-with-msbuild.html